ES Book a demo
Platform
Products
RAtrivity ReadinessAAtrivity Assistant
How it works
How Atrivity worksWhat reports you getAtrivity vs generic AICompliance and securityImplementation and service
Use cases
Launch readiness and supportWin against competitorsAssess and ensure readinessHCP and channel engagement
Evidence
What the users sayLife Sciences knowledge benchmarkResults from a sample of 100 programsMeasurement methods
Industries
PharmaMedtechDental CareAnimal HealthAutomotiveRetailTechnologyConsumer ElectronicsInsuranceBanking
Company
AboutBlogContact

Platform · Compliance

Nothing goes live until it passes the test.

Life Sciences cannot afford an AI that improvises. Questions and learning content are reviewed before launch. Atrivity Assistant draws on approved sources and is tested against agreed cases before activation; its generated answers are logged for review.

Five steps before activation

Pre-processed material, not raw documents.

Your Sales Layer is only as reliable as its documentation. So we review it before indexing, and you decide every editorial question.

  1. Briefing: audience, countries, tone, limits and what it must refuse.
  2. Fact indexing: every figure with its parameter, unit and condition.
  3. Conflicts: if two documents disagree, both values surface with their source.
  4. Client review: you decide which value wins. No source goes in without approval.
  5. Certification: adversarial test battery. Nothing activates below the threshold.
The golden rule we learned: performance depends on the knowledge base, and use depends on activation. Both are service, not technology.

Curation principles

Four rules we do not break.

01

Never add what the source does not say

Curation clarifies and structures. It never introduces information.

02

One consistent value for each fact in its defined context

For the same parameter, unit and conditions, conflicting values are resolved with your experts before the sources are approved.

03

The client decides

Editorial decisions, such as which of two values wins, are yours, not ours.

04

Diagnose before correcting

We find out why an answer fails before touching anything, then answer and correct.

What curation finds

Model quality matters. Source quality matters more often.

In our experience many wrong answers trace back to two client documents that say different things and that nobody had compared. Here is what one MedTech client's documentation revealed.

23documents in different formats, 98 pages, reorganised into 9 topics
18points only the client could resolve, sent back with the evidence
3wrong figures found in material the field was already using
94adversarial test questions used to identify failures and verify corrections
Certification test run for another client · 13 categories90 of 94 passed

Anonymised examples from real certifications.

Behaviour in the field

Guardrails that hold under pressure.

Closed corpus per client

Each Atrivity Assistant deployment only queries its own client's documents. Nothing from the open web, nothing from other customers.

It says when it does not know

If a point is not documented, it says so and lists what is missing, instead of producing something plausible.

It asks before answering

When the correct answer depends on a detail the rep did not give, it asks first. A half answer can be off-label.

It does not bend to hierarchy

A wrong rule is corrected whoever it comes from, by quoting the approved text.

It separates what can and cannot be said

Each claim is bound to the study that supports it, and no further.

Every answer has a source

Answers point back to the approved document they come from, so claims stay on label.

Every interaction is logged

Questions, answers and sources are recorded for review, analytics and audit.

Security

Verified by third parties.

Independent external assessments, renewed every year.

CyberVadis 2026 Silver rating, Compettia, 897/1000 Mature

CyberVadis rating

CyberVadis Silver 2026 · 897/1000, Mature level. Valid until July 2027.

Annual ethical hacking audit

An external team attacks the platform the way an intruder would. Findings are fixed and verified in a retest.

Management web10/10Very high level
Mobile app9/10Very high level

Retest December 2025

Controls

What is in place.

Source-locked content

Questions, micro-content and Atrivity Assistant answers come only from your approved documents.

Tested before go-live

Your experts review and sign off content and Atrivity Assistant behaviour before launch.

EU data residency

Data hosted in the European Union on Microsoft Azure.

Tenant isolation

Each customer's content and data are kept separate from every other customer.

Audit logs

Who changed what and when, traceable for your review and audit teams.

Privacy by design

Built to support your data protection obligations under GDPR.

No training on your data

Customer data is never used to train AI models.

For IT and Compliance teams

The questions you will ask.

Can it answer outside the approved scope?

It is designed not to. The knowledge base is closed and curated with you, out-of-scope questions are declined, and certification tests that behaviour before go-live. Declined questions are logged so you can review them, and no system is perfect, which is why the log exists.

Where does the data live?

In the European Union, on Microsoft Azure, isolated per customer.

Who decides when two documents disagree?

You do. Both values surface with their sources, and no source goes in without your approval.

What happens when the documentation changes?

Maintenance is monthly or quarterly, as you choose, timed with your post-cycle meetings: we review feedback and unanswered questions, update the knowledge base, retest the affected answers and report usage to you. Urgent changes, such as new product safety information, follow the process and response times agreed in your contract.

What does certification test, and what does it not?

It tests Atrivity Assistant against a set of real questions agreed with your experts, including hard cases, out-of-scope requests and conflicting sources. It does not prove every possible answer is right, so answers are logged, reviewed at every maintenance round and retested after any change to content or model.

Can we audit what the field was told?

Yes. Every interaction is logged with its question, answer and source document.

See how it would work for your team.

30 minutes with our team. We show you how we find the knowledge gaps in your field team, how they are closed and a sample report.